First of all thank you MatN (as from what I understood you were the person who allowed appimage to be built),
I followed the recent switch to appimage and I understand it makes sense as there is no need for different builds. Just one thought, why appimage and not flatpak? I prefer flatpak but my personal preference doesn't matter, I think the only cons of flatpak compared to appimage is the larger size (in today's world it should not be an issue but I realized that for many good internet is not a thing yet). However I would like to point out which IMHO is the best advantage of flatpak over appimage, flathub, the repo where many, popular FLOSS softwares are present. I remember reading appimage has something similar but I think it is nowhere near as popular as flathub. A search for 'video editor' shows many cinelerra 'competitors' but no cinelerra :/ https://flathub.org/apps/search/video%20editor Are there plans in the future to offer a flatpak of cinelerra as well? -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
