чт, 15 сент. 2022 г., 23:41 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:

> I will try it also.  With the previous patch my results are still a lot
> slower but the size is almost the same.
>
> PATCH * rendered 2712 frames in 1.595 secs, 1700.313 fps    11448186 = size
> OLD:  ** rendered 2712 frames in 0.190 secs, 14273.684 fps   11474493 =
> size
> NEW: ** rendered 2712 frames in 4.646 secs,     583.728 fps     9448273 =
> size
>
> I still am of the opinion that we should not upgrade or maybe wait for
> 1.4.x where x is some future fixes ??
>

I think compression level patch should work even with old flac ..


but yeah, you have some monster machine so may be new flac not as good as
old one on it especially.

can you try command line FLAC  compressor from 1.3 and 1.4 on same machine
too?

>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 1:14 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> can you try also this patch on top of previous flac patch?
>>
>> in theory it should add flac compression level support in gui
>>
>> чт, 15 сент. 2022 г., 15:40 Andrea paz <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Applying the patch and then rendering without touching anything I get
>>> the same result as before: twice as long and 4.7 MB in size. The
>>> default is: compression_level=5.
>>>
>>> Applying the patch and then varying the render parameter
>>> (compression_level=0):
>>>
>>> 0.664 sec
>>> 13711 fps
>>> 44.6 MB
>>>
>>> Good thing to have introduced the render parameters (well explained)
>>> so that the speed/size choice is left to the user.
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>
-- 
Cin mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin

Reply via email to