сб, 17 сент. 2022 г., 20:50 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:
> It looks like Andrea got good results -- will wait until Monday to see if > he thinks Flac 1.4.0 should go in. > Meanwhile, I decided to do a much bigger test and here are the results: > > Old: 671435 frames in 274.260 secs / 2448.170 fps / Size=2834313874 > New: 671435 frames in 244.648 secs / 2744.494 fps / Size=2786770407 > (Compression=0) > New: 671435 frames in 354.841 secs / 1892.214 fps / Size=2400810590 > (Compression=5) > > Would it not be better to put the default compression level at 0? That > would be the most consistent with the old version in speed and in size. I > do not think it is a good idea to change what the user is used to seeing -- > especially since the speed of the new version is better than the old once > Andrew's patches are applied. What do you think? > well, it seems speed/size in this case depend on content (what exactly we compress), so lets wait for more tests from Andrea. But at very least this parameter how configurable :-) > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:09 AM Andrea paz <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Here are the results with all patches (I did not install doxygen): >> >> ** rendered 9063 frames in 2.455 secs, 3691.650 fps >> >> ** rendered 9063 frames in 2.284 secs, 3968.039 fps >> >> ** rendered 9063 frames in 3.117 secs, 2907.603 fps >> >> NB: the value of "compression_level" remains as previously set, it >> does not change to the default automatically. >> >
-- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
