пт, 6 янв. 2023 г., 17:37 Andrea paz via Cin <[email protected]>:
> I feel similarly to IgorBeg. Without going into too much detail about > Open licensing, so as not to drive Phyllis crazy making she to pursue > rare data lost in the menadirs of time, I would just leave a general > Authors window for all the code, without having to put them in every > file header. > thing is, file WITHOUT such header probably can cause misunderstanding (at best) down the line .... (not to mention distant possibility of court action by some wanna-be Microsoft/Apple) so I think best course of action still fix most glaring omissions when possible, and then add details as we found them. > > For example, I would say that CinGG uses code from multiple versions > of Cin and also from external programs. For code derived from CinHV I > would put a link to the CinHV page; I would do the same for CinCV > (maybe it is better to ask Igor Vladimirsky, on which page to link) > and CinCVE (Einar). Instead, the original contributors to CinGG can be > made explicit clearly in this same authors window. > > In any case, the most competent person to ask is definitely Igor > Vladimirsky, especially for Cin HV; CV and CVE. > > Finally I would hear suggestions from the various contributors to > CinGG, for the best method by which to be cited; whether in each > headers of their code or in general without going into detail. > -- > Cin mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin >
-- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
