ср, 4 окт. 2023 г., 04:28 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:
> OK, will work on getting the build to work as I mentioned earlier. Next > time a new version of ffmpeg is released, we should probably upgrade and > not wait for the ".1" release which is what we have traditionally done. If > we had known how long 6.1 was going to take, we would have used 6.0. > > P.S. sorry for the late responses, I had the "handyman from hell" > "supposedly helping" me today with some physical yard work. > Well, at least we can hope you will not get a lot of rains ... they are necessary, but made outdoors work a little more complicated .... > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 7:22 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> ср, 4 окт. 2023 г., 03:55 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>: >> >>> Started to test now, but my build failed so will probably not get it >>> going until tomorrow so will let you know then. >>> >> >> >> Thanks anyway , I hope need for this patch will go away as we update ffnv >> headers .... >> >> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-October/315211.html >> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:39 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> this one apparently work better, in sense it compiles! >>>> >>>> can anyone check if cuda/nvenc hw acceleration still works with it? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:53 PM Andrew Randrianasulu >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Because ffmpeg 6.1 still not branched I guess we better to look into >>>> relevant changes ... and adapt our patch. >>>> >>>
-- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
