Den 02.12.2023 08:20, skrev Андрей Спицын via Cin:
Hello Phyllis, Terje and Andrew
Thanks for testing!
I have some experience with rpm-based systems. Why does dnf select the
i686 architecture in the first place? On Debian based systems, apt
selects the original architecture of the system by default.
Andrew, I think the spec file should be architecture agnostic.
Otherwise I'll have to patch it when I add i686 or arm64 builder.
Best regards,
Andrey
I don't use 'dnf' on Leap 15.5 but openSUSE's own package manager
'zypper' (optional supplemented with 'rpm' or 'YaST2' gui).
To compare with my previous installation output (last section) on Leap
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2023-November/007254.html
the 'libsuil-0-0-0.10.18-lp155.32.12.x86_64.rpm' was correct reported as
a dependice and add-installed during the Cinelerra installation.
Now to verify on the latest Cinelerra rpm installation on Leap:
zypper se -is cinelerra
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository
---+-----------+---------+--------------+--------+------------------
i+ | cinelerra | package | 5.1-20231201 | x86_64 | (System Packages)
and to check the 'libsuil' dependice for the installed rpm using zypper
and rpm (the latter can also be checked on Fedora)
zypper info --requires cinelerra | grep libsuil
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit)
rpm -qR cinelerra | grep libsuil
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit)
A tip might be a README file as earlier with installation
suggestions/experiences for LEAP/Tumbleweed, Fedora/RHEL and other
distributions
https://cinelerra-gg.org/download/README.pkgs
сб, 2 дек. 2023 г., 03:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin
<[email protected]>:
Thanks Terje ! works much better now once I installed the x86_64
version, which should have been automatic in the first place.
Sorry Andrey for my dumb mistake -- it installed from the build
farm and works just fine -- I just wanted to test it.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:54 PM Phyllis Smith
<[email protected]> wrote:
Terje, nice catch and definitely wrong BUT can not understand
why that happened?!
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:40 PM Terje J. Hanssen via Cin
<[email protected]> wrote:
Phyllis,
Maybe a stupid question, but as you have
suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686 installed:
Is this 32bit lib just just added to 64bit or a base 32bit
(i686) Fedora OS?
Terje
Den 01.12.2023 23:46, skrev Phyllis Smith via Cin:
Andrey, this is NOT Important as I was just playing
around with a newly installed Fedora 38, but here is what
went wrong.
# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by
cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
# dnf install libsuil-0.so.0
...
Installed:
suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686
...
# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by
cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
I will see if I can find the exact older version needed
and install it instead.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 5:14 AM Андрей Спицын
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Phyllis and everyone,
I've created a build farm for cinelerra deb and rpm
packages. Although it is at an early stage of
development, it can build packages on every git
change in the main repo. Feel free to use these
packages at
https://github.com/einhander/cin-gg-packages/releases. Note
that releases correspond to a build date, not a git
commit date.
Current build hosts are debian 12 and alma linux 8.
I'm open to suggestions for a new distro and packages.
Best regards,
Andrey Spitsyn
--
Cin mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
--
Cin mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
<https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>
--
Cin mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
