On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:11:07 +0100 "Terje J. Hanssen via Cin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Den 24.11.2024 22:22, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu: > > > > > > вс, 24 нояб. 2024 г., 19:45 Terje J. Hanssen > > <[email protected]>: <snip> > > I can't notice differences at playback with VLC and FFplay > > (other than 16:9 vs 4:3 format as usual). And both visually with > > good qualities in my eyes. > > > > Cingg Set Format Interlace Mode: Not interlaced > > did the trick and both hdv and hd could be rendered > > FFprobe reported it is pgogressiv, while native FFmpeg > > transcoding still say interlaced. > > > > > > > > But do files rendered by cingg set to progressive and ffmpeg from > > same tff source differ visually? > > No. It is easy to see during VLC playback that neither av1_qsv from > Cin/ffmpeg is progressive, but rather interlaced: > Pause during horizontal movements (camcorder panning) shows > interlaced vertical edges. Then shortcut "D" on this still image > swithch it to deinterlaced and smoother edges. This is on a computer > LCD monitor. I've have that problem as well, converting old VHS videos in PAL format to MP4 format. My solution is to use ffmpeg before editing in CinGG, using a de-interlace filter, as follows: ffmpeg -i inputvideo -vf bwdif outputvideo.mp4 Using mp4 as output format also reduces the original mpeg file to half the size. Instead of the -vf bwdif you can use the -vf yadif filter, but bwdif gave slightly better results for my videos. MatN -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
