On sre, 2006-02-08 at 20:15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > BUT, at the same moment there is a "strange backlash": all plugins as well as > the mask of track B gets inserted into the processing chain of track A. (at > exactly the point where the "track B" entry sits) > E.g. if I add a "color balance" to track B and use this to color track B > heavily > green, track A gets colored the same way. Is this intended behaviour? What > is the rationale of such behaviour? > OK I can get away by muting track A, but I like to understand the idea > behind... > > Btw: I am still using the heroine 2.0 version of cinelerra (but I plan > to try out the newest svn as soon as I get some time)
The concept comes from audio... where there are many situations in stereo, where you want to apply the same effects with the same keyframes to both tracks at the same time, without managing keyframes for every track separately. The same could be used for video tracks when you are combining some material in multitrack and want to fix all the material in the same way (apply the same color correction for example...) no matter which track the material is in... If you want to share just specific plugin, than you should use "shared plugins" option... Bye andraž _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
