On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:24:41 -0000, Alex Ferrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I got no problem at all.. I would consider all the content on
the wiki to be GPL'ed.
That said, I do not understand the ramifications of the fact that there
are a lot other contributors collaborating , and the fact that a lot of
the original material comes verbatim from Secrets of Cinelerra.
But as for me, you are welcome to use the material for your course, as
you
would with any other GPL'd material.
Thanks for the offer of your material. The ramifications are that each
copyright holder must agree to license their work under the GPL or
whatever license is used.
It would be good if we could somehow have an openl license for some
Cinelerra documentation. This could be done if contributors agreed to a
license as they contributed, as we do with out wiki and wikipedia do with
theirs. I would be willing to follow up any copyright holders who have
contributed if given the correct leads, and remove material that was not
GPL or CC'ed. I am committed to getting the best material for this course
and getting it openly licensed.
Incidentally, the Creative Commons license I would consider would be this:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/
or the non-commercial version
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
--
--
Ben Green
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
