..on (11/10/06 12:29), Stefan de Konink wrote: > To: [email protected] > From: Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CinCVS] Jah lives > Reply-To: [email protected] > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, mark stavar wrote: > > > I think it is generally accepted that this is a full rewrite. A lot of > > work. > > You could wonder why someone wants to use Cinelerra on Windows. A lot of > software including OSS software could be used on Win32. A better thing > would be a live CD for evaluation. > > About the OpenGL. PLEASE NO. Did someone ever run Blender on ATI?
yes, i've had problems with two versions of fglrx since using Blender on a Linux system since version 2.25. aside from that it's reasonably fine these days. OpenGL is a smart way to go. for cards that support it, it'll help get the GUI off the CPU. many applications will rely on OpenGL for this reason in future. there's even talk of Pure Data following suit. in future it'll be hard to buy a card without a GPU. for those that don't have hardware accelleration it is still a sane choice. OpenGL exists for performing fast geometric transformations and rendering them to a 2D surface. Cinelerra with zooming and smooth scaling windows would greatly aid productivity IMO. julian http://selectparks.net/~julian _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
