On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 17:40 +0930, Pierre Dumuid wrote: > > > ( See the ACTUAL RESULTS of applying the widgetgrid branch at: > http://www.pipapo.org/pipawiki/Cinelerra/Developers/pmdumuid/widgetgrid ) > > With the widget grid, all widgets are place on a grid (and possibly > sub-grids) then at the end of the dialog window formation, and > function > of the widgetgrid class will cycle though all the columns / rows > within > that grid, determining the maximum respective width / height and then > shift the widgets accordingly and then return a recommended size for > the > dialog window to be reshaped to accordingly.
Yes, this is nice. One thing though, horizontal dialogs seem a bit less disturbing to me.. if everything is vertical i get intimidated by the sheer number of things to set. So.. even with widgetgrid, things could go into width instead hight a little bit more. > Other's suggest going to gtk / QT.. My experience in these areas is > non-existant, but can agree that it's a good idea / massive amount of > work. I personally could see extended widgets (such as the tree > widget) > useful to develop stuff for newer features.. (I personally would love > to > integrate an asset management system consisting of a tree that I can > add > multiple branches and then leafs with the assets on them... but w/out > a > tree widget and the non-desire to re-invent one, I'm not so keen!) GTK/QT migration should probably done on window-by-window basis, or even first just migrating some dialogs. However, i am not thinking right now of doing anything even remotely similar. i/o formats and usability are my current work area. bye andraz _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
