G'day Pierre! I'm very selfish. I confess my first aim is to think like Cinelerra, to make it more likely that I get from her what I ask. My second aim is to make Cinelerra think like me, to better shape the software I use. My third aim is more of a dream: to think like you!
You see inside the depth of Cinelerra, I don't. I see the surface only. >From up here I see labels fixed at time positions or labels following an edit in cut-and-paste editing mode (they really look to me as non fixed at time positions). In drag-and-drop mode labels seems fixed again to time positions. They never follow an edit, even with the "edit labels" option on. Looking down from my soft armchair I see hard working Cinelerra developers using a magic trick to make labels following edits in one editing mode but not in the other. That's all my understanding can do. > Feel free to code up relationships if you like ;) Give me 20 years and I will! :-) Thanks for all your thinking, Pierre! Have a nice day down under! Ciao Raffaella On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 11:03 +1030, Pierre Dumuid wrote: > Hi Raffaella, > > Yes all those are very good ideas, and we likely share the same thinking > but it takes time / work to implement those ideas. Indeed labels should > be tied to something but they are not. The labels are decoupled from > anything whatsoever except time positions. In the default mode, > (unlocked) if you paste / cut / insert silence before labels, regardless > of weather you have any tracks enabled or not, the labels will move by > the cut / paste amount accordingly. If the labels are locked then cut / > paste operations don't move the labels. > > Feel free to code up relationships if you like ;) > > Pierre _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
