I recall the interlace patch modified the cinelerra's quicktime, and it is unlikely that the libquicktime project has taken that..
Andraž Tori wrote: > it is questionable if they provide the same level of functionality... if > you can do the research, you are welcomed ... > > bye > andraz > > On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:57 -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> I'm wondering, it seems that the internal quicktime code is quite a >> bit older than the external libquicktime project. Is there a reason >> why cinelerra is maintaining an internal quicktime codebase (still)? >> I realize cinelerra originally created the codebase, but wouldn't it >> be better to change to using the external library now? >> >> My point is, I can create a patch to use the external quicktime, >> unless there is some reason not to. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cinelerra mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > [email protected] > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
