On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:48:09PM +0900, Miha Kiti?? wrote: > ... > If I understand correctly, the main reason for cinelerra not to become > more widespread (e.g. included in various distros) is the lack of > GPL/LGPL licences in huge part of it's files. > > Is it not possible to licence these files? / Is there a good reason not > to licence them? > ...
IMO, HV thinks the LICENCE file is sufficient. I think releasing such a massive work under the GPL licence is really great. As regards to the reference to the GPL in each file, I think it would indeed allow Cinelerra to be included in the official repositories of main distributions. However, that's a task which isn't very interesting. I think that's why HV doesn't do it... but work on more complex stuff. ;-) Nicolas. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ BOYCOTT SUSE & NOVELL (C)(TM)(R) MICRO$OFT ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
