Ichthyostega wrote:
actually, success in running can help a bit. Am I asuming right you are
trying to install on debian or ubuntu? Well, I'm more familiar with that
then with RPMs  :-)
I have just switched to debian etch-amd64(smp) (upon official release) from fedora core 4-64. After about a week I decided to 'upgrade' to sid and that was when I decided it was time to get cinelerra working again...
If you want to investigate further on debian/ubuntu, the next step after
"successfully running" would be to re-compile the bin package you just
successfully installed. Ideally this would give you a working compile
(for further investigation different switches or for getting things
like opengl running).
okay - I will slowly begin to try such things out - I have lots to learn about deb packages so that should be fun..
Basically, the version in Cinelerra-SVN is a valid debian package. So it
could be feesible to take a diff between vale's package and the Cinelerra-SVN.
For this to work you would need the same SVN-revision which was used to create
vale's package.
ah. interesting!  Maybe I can do that...
Do you know the tools available for building on debian?  -- see below for sort
of a short version "how to build on debian". I'm attaching this just in case
it may be helpful.
very new to me. Perhaps I will try rebuilding x264 and libavcodec(cvs51?) using the deb packages as my next step.
Further, I allways get a -fPIC problem with x264 and have to...
ln -s /usr/lib/libx264_pic.a /usr/lib/libx264.a
just one more note - I don't have a lib264_pic.a file - neither my own build of x264 nor the x264 deb package created this. Did you name it yourself during your rebuild?

once again you've given me a way to move forward.
thank you
Graham

_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to