> Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:41:53 -0400 > From: "Leo germani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [CinCVS] I believe in cinelerra continued > Reply-To: [email protected] > > ------=_Part_18807_21632693.1201092113043 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > > > > > > those=B4re just ideas, listen or ignore it... no big deal, but LISTEN WHA= > T > > TE MARKET IS SAYNG, and the market IS NOT USING LINUX. > > ok, bye > > > > http://studio-linux.org/studios/index.html > > If you read portuguese: http://pirex.com.br/2007/03/01/linux-em-hollywood/ > > Leo,,
that´s movie making, that means nothing, cellphones uruns linux but you can´t think that cinelerra can run there :) hehehhe you are talking about MOVIE-MAKING-frame-sequences but what about 720x576 VIDEO EDITING? that´s totally different, I mean is there tv channels using linux/cin ONLY for editing? do you think cinelerra can reach that market? that´s more CINEPAINT-FRAME-BY-FRAME... they use linux, but cinelerra is more for a continuous NLe editing in studios (It seems), to be plugged to a DV or HDV camera. Am I wrong? that´s all if you focus in CINEMA, don´t use DV, use OPENEXR but blender is stronger there, with the node editor... if cinelerra aims to be A PROFESSIONAL EDITING SYSTEM, dont´ dare to think about Disney, Digital Domain,... etc.. do you think they need cinelerra?, they can afford comercial tools, or even have threir own programing infraestructure... focus in documentary, Tv spots, tv shows and stuff like that... VIDEO EDITING. cinelerra has some incredible features and GREAT Potential, but if you aim to 32 bit, adobe premiere is faster and better, in 64 bits, with linux cinalerra could have some advantages. Marcos Caballero _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
