On Monday 28 January 2008 22:42, Herman Robak wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:26:10 +0100, Johannes Sixt > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 28 January 2008 19:46, Herman Robak wrote: > >> Cin3 has it's core team, an architecture and is working on a plan. > >> Is there anyone interested in forming a core team for Cinelerra 2.x? > > > > Well, I for one will stay with Cinelerra 2.x for the moment. Not that I > > plan > > to add any new features... But removing reproducible bugs is certainly > > something that I shall do. > > > > But let me ask what you mean by "core team"? > > Good question. I think of it as a few (2-5) coders who understand > Cinelerra's current architecture, and have an idea where it should > be going then next year or two. > > I know that's a bit vague. What do _you_ think a core team ought > to know and do? :-)
I know my question was a bit rhetorical. ;) Of course, a core team should understand the architecture. As far as I'm concerned, I'm severly limited with my time these days that I can devote to Cinelerra. I don't intend to learn the code that I don't know, yet, which is almost everything outside cinelerra/ and guicast/. This implies that I can't be bothered with issues about mpeg, divx, etc. i.e. everything that is of some relevance for HD. So I'm probably not that helpful if you mean to have some *real* core team that gives the project a push. :( -- Hannes _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
