Ciao Herman! :-) > I think your assumption is wrong.
Thank Goodness it is. :-) > There are two ways of deinterlacing: > To blend the two fields into a frame, or to upscale them into one frame > each. The latter preserves the temporal resolution, and you get fluid > 50Hz output. The former gives you the stuttery "film look" :-P But my being not convinced is right: Bob-deinterlaced-VLC playback of my interlaced video *is not* the same as the Standalone-DVD-player-to-TV playback. They both have a 50Hz output but TV keeps the comb artifact and VLC removes it. That may explain why my deinterlaced video (Bob-and-Weave Cin Deinterlace Effect) plays so well on TV. Still I don't understand why it plays much better than my interlaced video. I'm now tempted to use deinterlaced videos for my DVDs, so I can easily get good quality playback both on computer screen and on TV. Moreover: If Bob & Weave upscale the fields into one frame each, why Cin Deinterlace dialog toggles between "Keep top field" and "Keep bottom field"? Thanks Raffaella _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
