Agree. Better quality, keeps 16:9 aspect ratio, allow lager clips and
you can allow people to download the original that you uploaded.
All in all much better than YouTube (last time I checked).
Aaron Newcomb wrote:
Yep. Just started using Vimeo. Great quality. 500MB/week limit. Check it out.
On Feb 11, 2008 12:26 PM, Martin Ahnelöv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mån 2008-02-11 klockan 17:32 +0100 skrev Burkhard Plaum:
Hi,
Stefan de Konink schrieb:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Thomas H. George schreef:
I gave my daughter a brief video of her son rendered as .avi file. She
tried to post it on YouTube but received a message that it was an
incorrect codec. What should I give her that she can post to YouTube?
ffmpeg can encode it to flv.
Yes, but then youtube might transcode it once more to further degrade
quality :( I would be surprised if youtube takes flv files without
transcoding, since they have strict constraints regarding bitrate, image
size etc.
I never uploaded to youtube, but If would, I would try to stay
closely below the filesize limit, i.e. encode as high quality as possible.
jpeg photo for example, if the duration is short enough.
Burkhard
Nah, come on! youtube is ment for ~3 min shitty home videos. If you want
high quality, use Vimeo, archive.org, or host it yourself.
Videos that does not take forever to load is more fun to watch. And
youtube will kill your well-mastered masterpiece anyway.
Gasten
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
