On 2008-09-18 16:49, Simeon Völkel wrote: > > Hanno Böck wrote: > > Is there any statement from HV if there'll be any back-merging? > > > > HV stated quite clearly that they don't want to spent much bandwidth > to do that, as they want to focus on their interests which shifted a > bit. > > > It's probably not the best idea to keep two completely separate trees and > > try > > to merge stuff in rare cases. Though isn't there a chance to coordinate > > development again? > > Their interest in having one single tree is quite small, as they > don't want to focus on patches, bugfixes or just minor improve- > ments they don't need at the moment. > > According to Adam the best option to contribute at the moment is to > copy their work into Cinelerra CV instead of the other way round. > > I haven't found a definite statement whether there will be a larger > back-merging or not. In recent years a few fixes have been merged > back while a lot were either ignored or rejected. >
This somewhat ignores the history of CinCV. However, the basic behavior has always been pretty simple. If you would like to get work into Adam's release, you can submit patches to him. He has not in the past followed are cvs/svn, but he has reviewed patches out of our repo that are submitted to him. Suggesting that he do some kind of back merge seems kind of demanding since he already maintains his release. -- Kevin _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
