2011/2/15 Douglas Pollard <[email protected]> > On 02/15/2011 12:03 AM, Nicola Ferralis wrote: > > Hi, > > In the past few weeks, there has been a very interesting discussion in this > forum about the long term future of Cinelerra. This discussion made me > wonder if a short-term roadmap of Cinelerra really exists. In particular I > wonder if there is any set decision for a version 2.1.7 (and 2.1.8, 2.2, > etc)? More in general, what is the main feature/timeframe/else that usually > is set for a new stability release? Is the release process similar to what > Google deploys for Chrome (release often minor updates)? > > I'd like to hear some thoughts about this. As the maintainer of the > Cinelerra-ppa for Ubuntu, I wonder if instead of syncing only official > releases, I should instead sync with git every time a commit is pushed. In > this latter case, I would think a bump in version should be adopted. > > Thanks, > Nicola > > I don't know what needs to be done to Cinelerra but it definitely needs > some work. I get along with her very well as long as I am doing video. Here > I find no real problems. It is sound and syncing that makes me pull my > hair, as does titles. I get beautiful video and then add my music and as > long as I use wave sound files that goes well. They are usually only a few > files. Voice over may be twenty to thirty files. They slide up and down > the time lines and get all out of sync and some times the credits at the end > wind up in the title page. Some times I completely loose sound files. > I have come to the conclusion that Cinelerra is probably the best video > editor around and the worst audio editor there is. > My solution is to make all my video clips, do my video with sound( > music and video sound) then I make my title clip and my credits clip render > them and add them in after all video is done. After this I take my rendered > video to Openshot video editor and add on my voice over clips. They stay > very stable there. > I am sure this is a hokey way to do video, but it works for me though > it is more time consuming than it needs to be. It may be that instead of > dragging and dropping files I might instead cut and paste, this might help > some of the problem?? I plan to play with that some. > It seems that as long as my video is less than about 6 minuets all > goes well but the longer and more complicated the voice over gets, the worse > the problems get. I have yet to make a single video 15 minutes long without > resorting to taking it to Openshot to put in voice over and render. Doug > I find I am much less frustrated working this way. >
Resynchronization may be a configuration problem. A typical mistake is to put the project at 44,100 Hz and upload audio to 48,000 hz. I've only done music videos for 5 minutes, so I have not had that problem. Yosepkey
