Thank you Hermann. I once read about that HW was making his own way and don't wants to work with others on his project. (Something like this anyhow)
So I was not really expecting a melt down for the better between two projects. Also I don't know yet what is better in HW version then CV version. That's why I wanted to install it and test it. On the other hand I didn't want to uninstall CV version which works well for me. That's why I was wondering if we can have both. Now I have my answer. That's "no". About melting down the best of two versions : May be it's a silly idea but if there are any improvements on HW version which is worthy to put in CV version by melting them down and that may cost a week work we can open a subscribe list to cover the cost by those who are interested and can pay to have a new version upgrade.... The others can just use it. May be that's useless I don't know really. Because for the HW version there is no dialog. Unless being a master in coding, if you have a problem you don't have a solution. That's the main difference for me about CV version, where we can exchange solutions. For the moment I try to edit in HD (1920x1080) with CV version and as I can see it will be possible. I will certainly test Josepkey's way of 4,2 to see if that holds enough on my computer and see the differences. Thanks for help Haldun. Le 21/07/2011 01:08, Ichthyostega a écrit : > Am 20.07.2011 18:12, schrieb Haldun ALTAN: >> I followed the discussion about installing cinelerra 4,2 on ubuntu 10,04.... >> Following grandma's way. I just wanted to know if we can have the two version >> together ? Is there any conflict or tips to avoid them ? > > Hi Haldun, > > do you mean: > installing HV-Version4.2 and CV-2.1.5 simultaneously on the same system? > > That's dangerous or even impossible, because Cinelerra loads parts of the > code as "dynamic library", which might lead to mixing up code from both > versions in an unpredictable manner. (It depends very much on minute > details of your setup if this works or causes problems). > > or did you mean: > Why can't we just create a version which joins both codebases togther > and gives us the best of both worlds? > > Indeed, that's a bit depressing. It *would* be possible and for sure > would bring ahead the Cinelerra community by a large step. Unfortunately > doing so requires some amount of work. Work, which is not exciting, > just rewarding in the sense of having achieved something. Judging > from my gut feelings, I'd guess that to be about one week of full > time developer work. > > What puzzles me is, this just doesn't happen since some years now. > And what's yet more surprising is, that -- for earlier versions, > like 2.0 or 2.1, it *did* happen. The breaking point, where this > changed was around 2007, if I recall correct. But I'm still at > a loss, when it comes to understanding what actually changed? > Was the community more vibrant at those good old times? > Did Cinelerra look more attractive in those years? > Was there a change in the general Opensource culture?? > > Hermann V. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > [email protected] > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra > _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
