On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:49:37 +0200 Ichthyostega <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please understand me right: none of the above is objectionable. It is > valid behaviour of an entity operating commercially and oriented > towards revenue. Just -- right here we're talking within the context > of *real* Open Source projects. And it is foreseeable, that > Lightworks will try to be precieved as "OpenSource", and thus we can > expect Cinelerra, Lumiera, Open Movie Editor, Kdenlive, PiTiVi, > gstreamer, mlt, gmerlin,.... but also projects like Blender to be > compared with Lightworks. Honestly, we should reject and defeat such > an comparison, because it would be the classical comparison of apples > and oranges. Nicely put together. Congrats! Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
