Hello No some hard drives are labelled "raid edition enterprise" they are suppose to be more reliable.Have a look on the WD web site.
As for Raid XFS, not too sure the howto under Ubuntu. A piece of cake under Suse though. There you need to go back to the manualCheersE --- On Wed, 2/5/12, Haldun ALTAN <[email protected]> wrote: From: Haldun ALTAN <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [CinCV] grand'ma proxy To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, 2, May, 2012, 7:12 PM I looked for XFS file system mine is ext 4. I have to make some more readings to understand the how to. I checked for Raid enterprise. Is that about are the Intel solutions ? Is that means separated hardware solution. Thanks, Haldun. Le 02/05/2012 00:49, E Chalaron a écrit : Well, Raid 0 is fast especially on XFS filesystem... You will see the difference. However... If one disk packs up... that's it... As for me it is not a problem : data are not supposed to stay, I grab frames, process, export then delete. And if trouble happens : I rescan. Yes a pain but not dramatic. Counterpart of XFS : it gets fragmented. So you need to look after that. There is a lot of tools for XFS. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/my-own-xfs-jfs-ext3-benchmark-809670/ Maybe a redundant array on XFS liek Raid 5 or 10 as suggested. But get your Os on a separate drive. That will save you some big problems if a disk goes wrong. More important than speed, I found that Raid enterprise edition of drives are way better. Cheers E On 05/01/2012 11:27 PM, Haldun ALTAN wrote: Thanks Edouard No not yet. I thought 10 000 tours and SAS will be enough. And I hesitate between RAID 0 or 5 don't know exactly which one will be better ... Thanks a lot. Haldun Le 01/05/2012 02:50, E Chalaron a écrit : Haldun Did you set up your 2 drives as Raid 0, you may well have a bottle neck there if not. Careful that you may need a dedicated drive for your OS. cheers Edouard On 04/28/2012 04:28 AM, Haldun ALTAN wrote: Another great bunch of thanks to Rafealla and her grandma's advises without which i couldn't make the last work where DNxHD was not fluid enough. So i did it with proxy editing and that was great. I could use 6-7 video channels without any problème and render with DNxHD version on mjpega to get HD with handbrake. Anyway proxy is great even if you have to do everything twice at tjhe end you earn a lot of time when you're editing. in fact I don't understand why it's so slow. I bought recently a second hand PC with two xeon 5460 3,1 ghz 4 cwith 6 go ram and nvdia quadro fx4600 and two hard drive sas 10000 tours with 300 go each. cpu is working 100% memory is saturated at 6 Gio Tell me just if it's normal that i have to wait 6 minutes for 1 min vidéo on background rendering with jpeg quality at 20 % ? Thanks Haldun. _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
