And, to my knowledge, technical research on OSPF is more fertile than IS-IS, and new feature is introduced to OSPF eariler than IS-IS.
--- "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>写道: > omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 > 7:32 PM: > > > Hi list, > > > > We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 > PE Routers and 2 P > > Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the > IGP is OSPF, > > however ISIS was proposed too. What is the best? > IS-IS or OSPF? and > > Why? regarding the small network. > > check the archives, this has been discussed before.. > it boils down to > "use what you're most comfortable and familiar > with", and as you're > using OSPF already, the choice should be clear. > > oli > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at > http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > ___________________________________________________________ 抢注雅虎免费邮箱3.5G容量，20M附件！ http://cn.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
