64 byte no burst bidirectional from Ixia. GE to GE with no features.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:43:25AM -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Euan Galloway wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:49:53AM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote: > >> Here is a rough spreadsheet with the numbers we had done. > > > > For the attachment challenged amoungst us... > > How were these tests performed? Was this done with different packet > sizes, or the worst-case scanerio - lots of tiny packets? > > jms > > > (excuse the bad reformatting). > > (CPU) (CPU) > > Pps NPE-G1 NPE-G2 > > each direction > > > > 100,000 31% 49% > > 125,000 37% 51% > > 150,000 44% 55% > > 175,000 53% 58% > > 200,000 61% 60% > > 225,000 67% 61% > > 250,000 75% 63% > > 275,000 84% 65% > > 300,000 90% 68% > > 325,000 98% 70% > > 350,000 100% 73% > > 375,000 100% 75% > > 400,000 dropped packets 400,000 pps 78% > > 425,000 81% > > 450,000 83% > > 475,000 86% > > 500,000 88% > > 525,000 91% > > 550,000 94% > > 575,000 95% > > 600,000 97% > > 625,000 98% > > 650,000 99% > > 675,000 99% > > 700,000 99% > > 725,000 99% > > 750,000 dropped packets at 750,000 pps > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
