Selon Gert Doering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Jerome Covini wrote: > > Jared Mauch wrote: > > > if you have vlan1 on more than one interface (eg: gig1/1 and gig1/2) > > > they are actually the same vlan. This device is a switch, not an > > > independent router. > > > > For info, the platform onto which it was working was a totally different > > one i.e. Cisco 8540CSR with 2port GE modules. > > The 8540 is more a "router" type device (well, routing bolted onto an > ATM switch or so) - the 6500/7600 is an "ethernet switch" device, with > some of the good sides of it (cheap & fast & can do nice tricks with > etherchannels etc.) and some of the drawbacks (global vlan space, not > per-interface). > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Thanks you all folks for your detailed explanations. Now that Im hitting a wall with the 6500/sup720 based platform, would you recommend another platform that would allow to replicate a (bad) C8540 setup ? (i.e., allow vlan-1 tagged L3 subinterfaces, and also, allow to use the same vlan tags over different physical interfaces) ? I believe I should look within the 7200 series platform. cheers, jerome _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
