On 5/21/07, Tim Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 1841 also has hardware crypto included (rated 40Mbs 3DES, take with > usual marketing salt), whereas you'd need the appropriate AIM for the > 2651XM.
On the 1841 you've also got the option of a AIM-VPN/SSL if you go down the GET path later. Also, don't forget that you also pick up and additional 128mb of ram over the 2851XM, and CF-based flash, so keeping a few extra images laying around is an option. 2600XM's went EOSales a couple of months ago, so you're at the end of the feature road, whereas the ISR's all still have quite some time. > If it's all Ethernet (ie things like the wireless and satellite are all on > their own end-point devices with an Ethernet hand-off), I'd definitely > look at the 1841. If you've got any weird and wonderful interface cards, > you might want to double-check compatibility. With the huge variety of interfaces that have been released in the last year in HWIC's, I would think this argument would be the other way around. I'm drawing a blank on what the 2600's (besides 2612) can terminate that a 1841 can't. If connectivity is all ethernet, consider the 1811 (or 1811W), which will save you some of the premium on 1841's modularity. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
