Rodney Dunn wrote: > There were bugs as in any new implementation. > > There is a misconception that it was abandoned because of bugs. > That is not the case. It was running wonderfully and still is in a lot > of networks.
According to a Cisco field notice, the NSE-1 (at least certain revisions) were all qualified to be replaced with NPE-400's at no charge. So I don't know if that's "abandoned" or just saving face! ;-) I know we took advantage of this on a few of our 7200's as we were constantly having performance and crashes due to PXF errors. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com) PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292A 8580 500E 66F9 0BFC "640K ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
