If you look at the configuration guide for the SIP-400 it lists the following:
"The Cisco 7600 SIP-400 supports installation of up to two 2-Port Gigabit Ethernet SPAs without any other SPAs installed in the SIP." In my testing of OC48+OC12 I received this error when adding the OC12 SPA: 002228: SLOT 3: *Mar 1 00:00:07.859: %SIPSPA-4-MAX_BANDWIDTH_NS: Total SPA bandwidth exceeds line card capacity, installed combination of SPA interfaces is not supported While the SIP-400 had no problem delivering line-rate traffic over both at IMIX packet sizes, the card is packet-rate limited to 2.5Gb/s @40 byte packets. I believe it's a 20Gb fabric connection, so that's not an issue, it's the forwarding engine of the SIP-400 itself. Phil On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:08 AM, MKS wrote: > On 6/1/07, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Is this something that has changed recently or has sup-32 >>> always supported the sup-400. >> >> Not "always". Sup32 has supported SIP-400 since SXF. >> >> -A >> >> Well in any case the product sheet is confusing.... > > Does somebody care to enlighten me about the switching fabric on the > SIP-400, when do I want to have to connected to the fabric. > I assume that the highest density setup would be 4 times 2-port > 1GbE SPA > modules, a total of 8Gbps. > But according to the specs the SIP-400 only does 4Gbps @64-byte > packets. > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/ > products_data_sheet0900aecd8027c9e6.html > > Regards > MKS > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Phil Bedard [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
