We must have missed that throttle somehow. Can anyone verify a SRB image?
I don't think it's worth touching SXF at this stage. On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:34:03AM +1000, Dale Shaw wrote: > On 6/13/07, Kevin Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Except under 12.2(18)SXF9 (and recent SG and SE): > > Yeah, I've just rolled out a bunch of new Cat65s running 12.2(18)SXF > code and "no ip proxy-arp" (which I entered) appears in the running > config, indicating (to me at least) that it's not a default setting. > > Your test (sh int blah) is clearly "better". I was surprised to read > that proxy ARP was no longer a default in 12.2(18)SXE. > > cheers, > Dale > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
