Hi Scott, If I may ask: What problem are you actually trying to solve? I can't see how the idea below saves you anything from just shutting down the session. You still incur a CPU hit when you withdraw all your routes by no longer receiving them from the upstream, and the internet still recalculates if you change the local preference.
On 22-Jun-07, at 4:25 PM, Voll, Scott wrote: > Thanks to all that replied online and offline. > > I like the idea of decreasing Local Preference and not advertising and > receiving routes. > > Thank again to all > > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:10 PM > To: Voll, Scott; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Graceful way to terminate BGP Session > > Hi Scott: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott >> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 12:59 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [c-nsp] Graceful way to terminate BGP Session >> >> I have two ISP running BGP. I have just installed a Third and all >> seems >> to be working. >> >> >> >> We are going to terminate one of the former ISP BGP sessions. Is > there >> a way to do this gracefully without causing all sorts of routing >> issues? >> I'm thinking shutting down the Gig port is not my best option. Do I >> just remove the BGP Neighbor? Will that cause me issues also? >> >> > You can shut down the neighbor. > > router bgp xxx > neighbor 1.1.1.1 shutdown > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
