Bear in mind 'ip policy route-map BLAH' has no effect on self generated packets.
In your test, are the packets matching the ACL sourced from 172.20.0.49 (router itself) or 172.20.0.50? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of omar parihuana Sent: 03 July 2007 00:17 To: nsp Subject: [c-nsp] PBR Strange behavior Hi List, I've configured an policy routing, however the packets don't match the policy. I re-checked the configuration and all seems fine, I don't know why that configuration don't work!!! (the packets traverse by default route and not by Next-hop configured into route-map. I've paste my configuration: ! interface FastEthernet0/0.73 encapsulation dot1Q 73 ip address 172.20.0.49 255.255.255.252 no ip redirects no ip proxy-arp ip policy route-map NEXT-HOP no cdp enable arp timeout 300 end ! ! route-map NEXT-HOP permit 10 match ip address 160 set interface Serial1/0:0 set ip next-hop 172.16.1.134 ! ! access-list 160 permit ip 172.20.0.48 0.0.0.3 any ! Thanks *The router is a Cisco 3640 with CEF Enabled that works like MPLS-PE router. -- Omar E.P.T ----------------- Certified Networking Professionals make better Connections! _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
