Hi Eric,
Exactly.
As PE would forward Spanning tree BPDUs transparently, I am considering
STP is also an option to block a link.
For example:
CE1-A_(fa-1/1)--------------- PE1=======PE2---------CE2-A (STP ROOT)
| \ /
(fa-1/2) \ /
|_________________________ \ /
PE3
Considering CE2-A is STP root, CE1-A would receive BPDU from both
interfaces, would choose fa1/1 as RP and would block fa1/2.
What do you think?
I hope we receive more feedback.
Best Regards,
Alaerte
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Eric Helm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Dual-Homed VPLS
Alaerte...
Are you talking about dual-homed VPLS endpoints? If so, I'd be curious
to hear what suggestions you receive for this topic. When I looked into
doing this, it seemed that using Flex-Links was the only viable
solution.
Regards,
/Eric
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you indicate any reference for this topic?
>
> I tried some books like "MPLS Configuration on Cisco IOS Software"
> (pretty good book) by Lancy and Umesh, but it only touch the subject.
>
> Tks,
> Alaerte
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
