Hi,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:14:20AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Sorry for hijacking this thread -- but I wonder if BFD + static routes
> (with or without object tracking) is still unimplemented?
As far as I know, yes. And it would indeed be an even better approach
here.
> Given that you'll also need to bring down the routes on the other
> side, IP SLA + object tracking isn't as useful in many scenarios..
In our case, this is for a L2TP-terminated DSL setup, so if the line
(or something in the path) breaks, PPP keepalives will kill the interface,
and since the routes are only coming from radius, it will work.
For the more generic "routing to a customer interface that does not
proper signal path outage" this won't do, of course.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
