Tomorrow Mark Tinka said: > On Friday 24 August 2007 02:57, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > >> WHY is the "name" command used on ip route? WHEN is it >> proper to use it, and when is it improper? Has anyone >> gotten burned USING it or NOT using it? > > I have seen it provide *functional* use with cisco-avpair > attributes under an AAA profile in LSDO deployments. > > In some other places, I have seen it used to help folk > remember what the route is doing. >
I like that use best. A digital sticky note. ip route 192.0.2.1 255.255.255.255 Null0 name BOGON-NEXTHOP But the other day, I had an OIR event. When the interface config and dependent routes came back, the statics were mysteriously missing their names. :-( ../C _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
