Are the hosts in VLAN 25 on either switch supposed to be in the same IP subnet, or different subnets?
If you have, say, a dot1q trunk between the two switches there is no reason that traffic should be routed between the two, simply make sure that VLAN 25 is trunked to each opposing switch and it should be fine. Otherwise, post the snippets of relevant config from either end and Im sure someone on this list can help you out. Cheers, Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hitesh Vinzoda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cisco Mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:26 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Routed Vlans > Dear All, > > I have got a Layer 3 switch attached to a layer 3 switch and ospf running > between them. the link between them is a layer 2 trunk.just because i have > to extend a vlan which is behind the trunk. > > when i perform TRACERT i can see the ip of the interfaces of both switches. > does this mean the traffic is routed even if it is going L2 trunk. > > I want to route the Vlan over routed link and function as layer 2 vlan. is > it possible...? > > means > > *PC (VLAN 25) >>>>>>> L3 Switch>>>>Trunk + OSPF>>>>>>L3 switch >>>>>PC > (VLAN25)* > > I want the VLans to travel to a routed link instead of that right now it is > going through a configured trunk. > > Please advice. > > Thanks & Regards > > Ronnie > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
