Thanks everyone for your replies.. looks like I can't go wrong...;) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duncan Maccubbin Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 12:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1811 vs 2621
The 1811 (according to Cisco tests) is about 3x faster. The feature difference between 12.3 and 12.4T is staggering. The 1811 will support new codes that Cisco brings out as well. -----Original Message----- >From: Paul Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Sep 18, 2007 12:37 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [c-nsp] 1811 vs 2621 > >Hi folks... > >I"m looking at a few sites that we would normally put a 2621 into (not >XM) .... if I put a brand new 1811 instead of the 2621 in at these >sites am I gaining or losing horsepower? These routers will be >terminating PPPOE sessions as well FYI... > >Thanks for your input... > >Paul > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
