Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: >> [REP] has some but arguably not all the advantages of MRP or >> EAPS. > What's missing?
This statement doesn't seem too great to me (though I would want to set a few boxes up and work out how it works to be sure): "REP does not use an end-to-end polling mechanism between edge ports to verify link integrity. It implements local link failure detection." I have, perhaps, a like for the EAPS-style 'send a frame round the ring, if I don't get it back, open my blocked port and flush fdb'. MRPv2-alike multiple interconnected rings. Stated restoral time (200ms) isn't so great. Obviously, I've not spun this up yet, but it's something to be tested for sure. Will _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
