well you are lucky, but not mine. My ex-employer deploy many 1401 in distribution layer, for using it ATM25 to connect wireless backhaul. We found the ATM int. always port up protocol down, sh/no sh not always help, event if I have backup route to access it, most of the time, power cycle resume the service.
Most of the case, we have no staff in distribution hub. ;-) Finally, all 1401 was replaced by 2620+ATM25 NM Bob On 9/21/07, Gert Doering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 07:17:01AM +0800, Bob Chan wrote: > > I will keep away from 1401,unless your company have a "weekly equipment > > reboot" habit > > Can't second that. We had, at maximum, about 100 units deployed in the > field, and they have been *very* solid - that is: one or two units have > died in the course of 3-4 years, but besides that, nothing peculiar at > all. > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
