On 10/5/07, Andrew Gristina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/5/07, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Cisco CNS Network Registrar 6.1 > > > *vs.* > > > Lucent VitalQIP - IP & Name Management > > > > CNR is a fine DHCP server, but it's *just* a DHCP server. > > > > VitalQIP is much more than a DHCP server. It's more of an > > address management system, which includes a DHCP server. > > > > -A > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > We used QIP on HP-UX for a fortune 25 company. It was a small 10,000-20,000 node network. The clients/end points were mixed mixed windows and unix. It was no fun. It depended on an oracle backend, and had some quirks for distributing the infrastructure.
We replaced it with ISC's DHCPD and Bind and some well made shell scripts/web interfaces (mainly front ending nsupdate). I've never used CNS Network Registrar. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
