Hi all, Putting a full Internet routing table inside a VRF instead of in the global routing table, we see BGP convergence times about a factor 10 higher.
As far as we can tell, it's mostly the BGP process eating CPU time, so it doesn't seem to be a matter of label allocation or FIB/TCAM programming. What makes the BGP process behave differently in a VRF than it does in global routing table? Is it because the code hasn't been optimised for this? Or a hardware issue? Any knobs to adjust? Any improvements to this behaviour in SRB2 over SXE, SXF or SRA? -- Regards Christian Bering IP engineer, nianet a/s Phone: (+45) 7020 8730 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
