On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 06:42 -0500, Paul Stewart wrote: > I asked this question last year at some point.... I was told by many > that it's a bad idea, but I did have a few people chime in to say they > had done it with great success... > > This doesn't answer your question but if you have a chance give it a > try is what I'd say. We thought in our HSRP setup we would have to > have the IP's in different subnets but ended up working just fine in > an existing subnet so never actually had a chance to try it the other > way..
Yes, we have it running a few places with no problems, apart from the already mentioned, so I guess regular reasoning is the key here. On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 11:43 +0000, Tim Franklin wrote: > You lose the diagnostic ability to ping / check arp / etc explicitly to > the primary or secondary box. If that's not important to you, it does > save burning a couple of addresses from the customer-facing LAN subnet. Not optimal about diagnostics, no, but it's exactly because the customer doesn't want us to use "his" addresses. We can let them decide, and tell them that it may be a little more comples to troubleshoot. Thanks for the input, now I have a little more to continue with. :-) Regards, Peter Rathlev _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
