Of course you didn't specify ATM originally either. POS would probably give you a few more since you don't have the ATM overhead.
On Nov 17, 2007 3:09 PM, Garry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stewart wrote: > > A few people hit me offline stating that it's not nice to hold back the > > answers and that they were curious... right you are - sorry about that...;) > > > > The general answer has been 110-120Mb/s considering ATM overheads etc. on a > > 5 minute graph average - beyond that you are really pushing your luck. We > > have one such circuit today that is hitting 110 regularily and sometimes > > hits 120 for short peaks - my concerns are now staring at me on a graph.... > > In general (at least speaking from an ISP's point of view) when > utilizing a link beyond 90% peak or beyond 75% average, it's time to > upgrade ... otherwise it's just a question of time when the link > capacity is causing quality degradation for the users ... (unless the > peaks are caused by batch-only traffic). > > Take the usage graph to your boss and tell him you need another link or > an OC12 upgrade ;) > > -garry > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
