Guys,
Need your help on this...
Here is the scenario:
We have a Catalyst 6509 with Sup 720+Policy Feature Card 3 connected to the
Internet gateway Switch (catalyst 3750G). We are running Layer 3 etherchannel
between the Cat 6509 and Cat 3750G.
We need to restrict the bandwidth for one of the customer.
Requirement is as follows:
CIR of 4 Mbps and burst up to 8 Mb based on availability.
Thinking of using policing with ACLs based on the public IP address range on
the customer, however few questions here.
1) Is it advisable to do Policing only on the Cat 6509s in both direction and
avoid do any changes on the Cat 3750G. Is this the right way?
2) What should be the CIR, bc and be values to provide double the burst than
CIR based on avaliability?
Is the below statement correct? I believe Tc value for Cat 6509s is 0.00025
seconds, calculation is based on that.
police cir 4194304 bc 2000 be 4000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
violate-action drop
3) Is there any issues applying Policing on L3 etherchannels in both ways on
Cat 6509s?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Bill
---------------------------------
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
