Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: > Dear Aaron > > > regarding the bridging frame directly to your internal router via your > firewall , the below Cisco documents shows transparent bridging over > many scenarios including frame-relay to ethernet > bridging > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk331/tk660/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094471.shtml > > regarding the HW point , i believe that any cisco router support > frame-relay will do it > starting from Cisco 805 > > i hope you will find that useful in that case > > best regards > -- Abo Zaid > Thanks Abo, that seems to be exactly what I was needing and will do exactly what I was wanting.
I wonder why so many different thoughts on what the IOS can and can't do. Thanks again, Aaron > > > On 12/3/07, *Aaron* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I have run into a situation where i need to bridge my incoming > frame-relay t1 directly to an internal router's ethernet interface. > > I have no practical experience with cisco so i'm hoping the list can > give me some pointers and suggestions and ideally i'll only get 2nd > degree burns from the flames. > > The situation as i need it is as such:.. > My isp has a ptp address of 1.2.3.4 <http://1.2.3.4> and my > assigned address is 1.2.3.5 <http://1.2.3.5> > (ips sanitized of course). I want to pass the 1.2.3.5 > <http://1.2.3.5> address directly > through to my internal router eth0 interface. (sorry in adv. for the > crappy ascii art) > > ISP|unknown router|serial(Frame)|address 1.2.3.4 <http://1.2.3.4> > | > ______|_______ > wic-1t > some cisco router > ethernet > ---------|------------- > | > 1.2.3.5eth0 > internal router/firewall > > I have seen some examples but honestly i'm not even sure what > hardware I > should be looking at. The example from the archives > http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nsp&m=115982463524342&w=2 > <http://marc.info/?l=cisco-nsp&m=115982463524342&w=2> was talking > about a > cisco 1601, but that was a ppp based connection. > > Another thread i found http://marc.info/?t=118667690000005&r=1&w=2 > <http://marc.info/?t=118667690000005&r=1&w=2> > talked about a frame connection but then they were using a 2600 > and the > replies seemed a little mixed as one guy said he should switch to > ppp in > half-bridging and someone else replied about something called IRB > approach. I'm not sure if switching to ppp is an option here so I'd > like to concentrate on frame. > > I don' need/want routing, blocking, natting at all to happen on > the cisco, > essentially I want it to act like a hub/switch connected to my > internal > firewall/router. > > The reasoning behind this is, and please correct me if i'm wrong, > I want > as simple and worry free a setup on the cisco as possible. After > configuring it I won't be fiddling with configs unless something > were to > break. My internal router will do all the natting/firewalling and > routing, and i am confident when configuring that. I believe the > ability > on the OS is much more important than the OS. I will not need to > connect > to the cisco via tcp at all, all connects will be via the management > console. > > Any suggestions on hardware (less expensive the better), IOS version > i'll need and probably most importantly, config suggestions, > example or > link to pertinent material(i'm willing to learn to fish) would be most > appreciated. > > Thanks in advance. > > Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > <http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
