We've had pretty good luck with it - but haven't tried those traffic levels on a 2800 so can't provide any info there...
It marks packets really well for VOIP etc - we've never pushed it if you know what I mean but on 5-10Mb/s links it's worked well for marking and p2p limiting (the provider I work for doesn't limit p2p at all but I've done consulting to some other ISP's that do mess with p2p) Hope this helps, Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristofer Sigurdsson Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:18 AM To: Cisco NSP Subject: [c-nsp] NBAR on 2800 Hi list, I'm looking for words of wisdom on NBAR on the 2800s. The main link is 100 Mbit/s (at present maxing in 60 Mbit/s bursts, average 30 Mbit/s). We will implement a 20 Mbit/s backup link in the next few weeks. Both links are delivered as fastethernet links on copper. We would like to be able to block P2P, or at least most of the P2P. We will use a 2821 (currently in use for the main link without NBAR) for the backup link, which I believe is more than enough, but I'm a bit puzzled about the main one It will be a separate router, the bean counters will push for a 2821, but I believe that will not be enough. How about a 2851? Another thing. How good is NBAR these days? I have zero experience with it. Can it effectively block P2P? Can we mark and even prioritize VoIP? In short: does it work? Thanks in advance, Kristo _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: 1/9/2008 10:16 AM _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
