If the ultimate goal is "no BGP rib-failure" then yes. If the end goal is to steer traffic a certain direction then that may or may not be a proper solution. I don't have the whole scenario so I can't say for sure.
Phil On Jan 18, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Suzan S. wrote: > I think we will loose points if we are getting RIB-Failure routes in > the lab exam, so I think we have to prefer the BGP routes and to > change the administrative distance for the iBGP routes! Is this the > right solution? > > Thanks > > > > Phil Bedard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are you trying to accomplish exactly? If you want to use the BGP > routes as primary versus the IGP routes, you can set the > administrative distance higher for the IGP learned routes. Suppress- > inactive will keep the BGP peer from re-advertising those RIB-failure > routes to another peer. RIB-Failure isn't necessarily a problem... > > Phil > > > On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Suzan S. wrote: > > > Dears, > > > > When advertiseing the loopbacks in the bgp , they appear as RIB- > > failure routes in the BGP table as they are advertised through the > > IGP which has better adminstrative distance. Any one knows how to > > solve the problem of these RIB-failure Routes? Do we have to change > > the administrative distance for the IGP or BGP ? In some documents I > > read that we have to use the command bgp suppress-active under the > > router bgp config but it does not work. > > > > Thank you All > > > > Suzan > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! > > Search. > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. > Try it now. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
