Many tks Oli, In Cisco pages there is a note saying that PFCxx does not support load balancing at the tunnel ingress, so only one IGP path is used. This is the site:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SXF/configuration/g uide/pfc3mpls.html So I am wondering if at the end it is impossible to have PW load balancing in PE. (or if this does not applies to other train, like SR) Br, Alaerte -----Original Message----- From: ext Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:56 AM To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro); Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro); [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] EoMPLS and VPLS Load Balancing Alaerte Vidali <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:58 AM: > Tks Oli, > > Is it the same if instead of AtoM it is used VPLS? > That is, the same CEF hash mechanism is used to choose the path? > (without TE) Yes, as far as I know. To the forwarding plane, it's just another PW.. You can also use tunnel selection along with VPLS (as shown in http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/vpls_qos.html, section "Pseudowire Tunnel Selection") oli _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
