Yep, Already there. Thanks for 2950 & Hjan.
rgs a.r.i.rangkayo sutan Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:24:25PM +0700, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan wrote: >> Both direction, cat 2950. > > To repeat my questions, with a few more words: > > "Which of the directions do you have problems with the load distribution?" > (it needs to be tuned on the sender side, and we're not the Juniper list, > so for tuning Juniper->Cisco, please go to j-nsp). > > "How many ports"? > (load balancing will only work properly on 2-, 4- or 8-port channels) > > > Besides this, with a 2950, it's a bit tough, since it will only balance > based on ethernet MAC addresses. So if you have only a few machines > on one side, talking to a single router on the other sides, traffic will > almost always be imbalanced (because everything a single machine sends > to the router will use only use ONE link of the channel). > > The direction Juniper->2950 might have different constraints. > > gert > -- a. rahman isnaini r.sutan Research & Development Division PT IndoInternet Cyber Building 8th Floor Jl. Kuningan Barat no.8 Jakarta Selatan Phone : +62 21 5210607 Fax : +62 21 5210612 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
